|
BUT THEN AGAIN,
maybe not. Giving generously is a lot more complicated than most
of us think. There are many reasons for this but here are two of
them: the welfare state and globalisation.
The first Christians
had no welfare state. Those who were at risk orphans, widows,
children, the sick were dependent on their families and their
community for help. Christians were dependent on the generosity
of their fellow believers in the church.
In fact, it
is not that long ago that there was no comprehensive welfare state
anywhere. And when there was some kind of provision for the poor
and vulnerable it was often provided by churches and organised around
the parish system. However, gradually the state took over so that
now in most western societies the state provides services once provided
by the church.
Of course,
the money to run the welfare system does not come from Tony Blair
or Gordon Brown. It comes from you and me. If you pay tax then roughly
25% of what you earn goes straight to the state in Income Tax and
National Insurance. On top of that, almost everything you buy is
taxed at a minimum of 17.5%. And if you are buying petrol or alcohol
you are paying a great deal more. So, all of us taxpayers are handing
over at least 40% of our income to the state. And, if we are giving
40% of our income to provide for the community, surely we are already
giving generously. Realistically, anything we give out of the money
that is left, no matter how generous, is small change compared to
the amount we give in tax.
So, we come
back to the question, What does it mean to give generously? We are
already generous givers through the tax system (though whether we
like it or not is another matter). But perhaps our commitment to
or our involvement with our generous giving comes at the level of
how that money is spent. And that, in turn, means that one of the
ways we fulfil the biblical command to give generously is through
political activism.
This might
be direct involvement through joining a political party and campaigning
on our concerns. Or it might be indirectly, through supporting the
work of lobby groups. Many of us already do this without realising
it through support for agencies such as Tearfund or CARE. Either
way, it seems that in our time the command that those who are rich
should give generously might actually mean that those who pay taxes
should have a voice in how the money raised is spent.
If things are
complicated enough at home, they are all the more so when we think
about them on a global scale. It is not that long ago that for most
people their world was limited by how far they could walk. Living
localised lives, they encountered localised poverty and need. We,
on the other hand, encounter few limits on our world. Our lives
are global and, consequently, our awareness of need and poverty
and suffering is global.
We know what
is happening in Zimbabwe and Sudan, even if we have never been there
or even if we would find it difficult to locate them on a map. We
know when floods, earthquakes and famines strike we see the
consequences. One result of this is that we are so overwhelmed by
the extent of poverty and suffering that we are tempted to give
in to despair or indifference. How, we wonder, can we give generously
to the whole world?
Well, if we
want to try to answer this question we have to go back to politics
again. If we should be concerned about how our giving through the
tax system is used to deal with social problems here at home, then
we should also be concerned about how it is used to respond to need
and suffering far from home.
But this is
not our only option. If the biblical flip side of giving generously
is not exploiting the poor and needy in the first place, then there
are lots of things you can do. Do you worry about your pension fund
being invested in British American Tobacco or Del Monte? Change
it. You have plenty of options. Do you like the idea of producers
being paid a stable and fair price for their goods? Buy fair trade
bananas or coffee or tea.
Of course it
might be costly you might have to pay a little more for your
fairly traded bananas; your pension fund might not perform as well
without BAT or Del Monte. But who said it would not be costly? Come
to that, it might not be straightforward. Maybe some child made
your expensive trainers in a sweatshop in the developing world.
But maybe that childs options were a sweatshop or a brothel
or life on the streets. Maybe working slowly with a business to
get it to improve its practices is a better option for the child
than boycotts.
We cannot give
generously enough to solve all the worlds problems, but that
does not mean that from our position as rich Christians we cannot
make an impact for good in our world. The biblical command to us
as wealthy people to give generously seems, at first sight, to be
a simple matter. But, what I am suggesting is that it is far from
simple for us in the world we live in. What is required of us is
a different, creative kind of obedience.
ALWYN THOMSON,
formerly of ECONI, blogs at http://ourmanintirana.blogspot.com
|