|
THERE ARE THOSE
for whom nation, land, ethnicity and the story of their people and
how they got here is an irrelevancy; for others it is a potent force
for identity, belonging and even violence in defence of their peoples
dignity. Many in western modern societies seem to miss
that for the majority of the worlds population these things
do matter. A deep sense of honour and belonging shapes the destiny
of many leaders and nations.
This is not
to say that the concerns of community and belonging dont count
for us all. They do. It is simply that the world of the early twenty-first
century is divided as to how they matter.
In the west
we have become what one commentator has called consumer nationalists.
What matters most is what we are consuming in the moment,
whether that is family, friends, entertainment or possessions. Even
religion and our spiritual experiences have become part of this
embrace of the moment. As long as we are free to enjoy
what is ours to enjoy we arent too bothered by the offences
or hurts of the past. Nor, at times, does it seem we are that bothered
by present injustices, unless through mass economic migration or
political instability our capacity to maintain our lifestyle is
threatened.
There is a
positive spin to this approach. The largely peaceable nature of
much of western life in the second half of the twentieth century
owes much to a materially prosperous society absorbed on the journey
to self-fulfilment. A cult of entertainment and celebrity lulls
us further into giving little thought to the complex global relationships
of dominance and exploitation between peoples that maintain our
lifestyle.
Yet left unexamined,
the deep-rooted anxiety about who we are and who are our people
returns to haunt each generation. When our freedom to be left alone
is threatened we return to our gut hates and prejudices. It takes
surprisingly little to uncover the primal mistrust and suspicion
of the other beneath the civilised exterior. Economic prosperity
may give the building of good relations between peoples a good start,
but in itself it is no lasting fix.
It is healthy
that each generation asks the question, Who are we?
Who is modern Ireland and what is the story its peoples tell that
gives meaning to their belonging and participation on this island?
This is critical
as we approach the centenary of the founding myths of the two great
traditions that shape Ireland republican and unionist. 1916
was and is a seminal year for both. The Easter Rising and the Somme
offensive played a major part in shaping the story of Ireland in
the twentieth century. How we mark the centenary of these events
will be an indicator of how transformational the peace process really
is.
The fiftieth
anniversary, in 1966, could be said to have been the start of the
Troubles with the formation of the modern UVF as an expression
of growing unionist anxiety and mistrust in the face of a resurgent
militant republicanism which, despite the failure of the IRA border
campaign, had gained acceptability. Each of these factors fuelled
growing mistrust on both sides and shaped the tragic course of events
that took us in to three decades of violence, waste and human suffering.
It is important
how we now prepare to tell these stories to a new generation. How
do we imagine ourselves in the world of today? Peoples and nations
are shaped by the imagination and the communal experience handed
down from each generation. Events of fifty, one hundred and even
two hundred years ago are important because in the communal memory
they are measured not in years but in the relationships of a few
people across the generations. Parent, grandparent, great grandparent
and I can traverse 150 years through the first-hand stories of three
to four people.
It will not
do for us to avoid telling our stories, saying it doesnt matter
in todays world. It always matters. Left unexamined and not
retold, the trauma, hurt and experience of the last thirty years
will be retained as a deep well of sectarian hate and communal bitterness
waiting for another generations injustice to draw on its corrosive
power.
Nor can the
church wash its hands of responsibility for this process. Being
citizens of the kingdom of God emphatically does not mean we somehow
no longer belong to this community. In fact the opposite is true,
for Jesus sends us as he was sent to be embedded in the life
of a broken world. Nor can we sit idly by, as the world degenerates
before our eyes, awaiting its end. Belonging to this coming kingdom
compels us to be salt and light, to work for justice and peace in
a fallen world.
As part of
the Christian community of Ireland we need to take our place in
the conversation and debate that will shape the story we tell of
our people and place. Not least because we believe there is a deeper
well that people can draw from that brings healing and life. We
too need to retell our story as people of faith who have been both
complicit and a redemptive presence.
And there are
other peoples who have now made this island their home. The story
of how they have come to be here and their contribution to the country
we are today and will be in the future is profoundly important to
us all. Our ability to both hear and embrace these stories of migration
and settlement will have consequences for our society and for us
as the church. Especially as many of those coming share our Christian
faith, though shaped by different cultural forms and given a variety
of spiritual expressions.
Who we will
be and what we will look like in ten years time as a country depends
on how we shape the conversation now. As Christians we are called
to seek the welfare of the community to which we belong. We therefore
need an honest conversation among ourselves and to be a critical
conversation partner with wider society as we define ourselves in
relation to these icons of culture and belonging. In this way 2016
can provide us with a decade of opportunity in which to move out
of the ghettoes of our mistrust and hate.
|